Mark Webber Furious at Untransparent and Unequal Treatment | SENATUS

ASIA'S PREMIER LUXURY & LIFESTYLE MAGAZINE

SENATUS.NET

Mark Webber Furious at Untransparent and Unequal Treatment

Red Bull's Mark Webber is furious about the obviously untransparent and unequal treatment of drivers in the team, with Sebastian Vettel getting sole use of the new front wing design, allowing the latter to qualify ahead of him at Silverstone.

Vettel, Webber, Alonso qualify top 3. Hamilton is 4th and Button is a disappointing 14th.

SILVESTONE, UK - Red Bull brought only two examples of a new front wing design to Silverstone, and on Saturday morning Sebastian Vettel's broke during the pre-qualifying practice session.

The team took Webber's front wing off the sister RB6 and fitted it to Vettel's car before the young German secured pole in qualifying.

The previous specification was used by Webber, who qualified a tenth off Vettel's pace.

The story emerged immediately after qualifying, when Australian Webber refused to put his arm around Vettel for the usual post parc ferme qualifying pose for photographers.

And the 33 year old's face had not improved in the press conference, when he surmised that "the team is happy with the result".

Webber also did not stop for his usual talk with television interviews in the paddock.

Team boss Christian Horner said as recently as Friday afternoon that Webber and Vettel are treated "with transparency and equality", receiving "equal priority and treatment".

"I think the most important thing for any driver is to know that he's getting equality of equipment and priority," added the Briton.


Formula One

Fendi refurbishes Villa Medici - home of the French academy in Rome

Formula One

Lewis Hamilton Takes F1 Drivers Championship Lead for the 1st Time, Heads to Singapore Grand Prix Next

Formula One

Lewis Hamilton Nico Rosberg Off Track Rivalry

Formula One

Red Bull Previews Korea Grand Prix

All Rights Reserved. SENATUS © 2024
 

SENATUS is a registered trademark of SENATUS PTE LTD. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or used otherwise, except as expressly permitted in writing by SENATUS.